<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Artes mágicas - History Lab</title>
	<atom:link href="https://historylab.es/tag/artes-magicas-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://historylab.es</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 15:04:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Bonaventure</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/the-bonaventure/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-bonaventure</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adivinación]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artes mágicas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenaventura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caravaggio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartomancia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitanas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pintura barroca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pintura de género]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pintura siglo XVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/la-buenaventura/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Oil on canvas entitled Bonaventure by Caravaggio, in the Louvre Museum (Paris)</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/the-bonaventure/">The Bonaventure</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caravaggio (1571-1610) executed around 1595 a forerunner of genre painting, The Bonaventure. Painted for Alessandro Vittrice and now in the Musée du Louvre (Paris), it depicts two half-length figures in an indeterminate location. There is no indication of where the action is taking place, the scene being illuminated only by a light from the left that falls on the figures: a young man of distinguished appearance wearing a feathered hat and a gypsy woman, recognisable as such by her coppery skin, turban knotted under her chin, black hair and cape draped over one of her shoulders, as well as by the fact that she is engaged in the activity that gives the painting its title. Good fortune was a widespread practice in royal courts during the 16th and 17th centuries and was often complemented by astrology, which had been in vogue along with horoscopes since the late Middle Ages. It was also reinforced by the use of the tarot, a deck of 78 cards depicting various figures, which originated in northern Italy in the first half of the 15th century. In 1781, Antoine Court de Gébelin reasoned that the tarot came from Egypt, which quickly led people to associate card prediction with the Gypsies, as the Egyptian origin of this ethnic group had been a widespread and accepted belief until well into the 18th century. Gébelin&#8217;s theory was exposed to various distortions in the following centuries by authors such as Boiteau d&#8217;Ambly, Vaillant and Taylor, who still maintained that the Gypsies were the first connoisseurs and therefore disseminators of cartomancy.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/the-bonaventure/">The Bonaventure</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ludicrum chiromanticum Praetorii</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/ludicrum-chiromanticum-praetorii/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ludicrum-chiromanticum-praetorii</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Sicler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artes mágicas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buenaventura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitanas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitanos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.B. Paravicinus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Belot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Praetorius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ludicrum chiromanticum Praetorii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martín Antonio del Río]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patricio Tricasso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peruchio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quiromancia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torreblanca]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/ludicrum-chiromanticum-praetorii/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Frontispiece of Johannes Praetorius' Ludicrum chiromanticum Praetorii, 1661</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/ludicrum-chiromanticum-praetorii/">Ludicrum chiromanticum Praetorii</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chiromancy or fortune-telling was under suspicion until the 15th century, as it was considered a pseudo-science more suited to charlatans; nevertheless, from 1500 it became extremely popular and it was not long before the first treatises were published around the first quarter of the century, including Patricio Tricasso&#8217;s La quiromancia, which was republished during the following two centuries due to its notable success. Even more famous was the book by the Jesuit theologian Martín Antonio del Río (1551-1608) entitled Disquisitionum magicarum libri sex, in which he attributed to gypsy women the speciality of reading hands for divinatory purposes. Towards the middle of the 17th century and towards the end of the century, other treatises such as La Chiromance Royale et Nouvelle by Adrian Sicler, La Chiromance, La Physionomie et la Geomance by Peruchio or Les Ouvres by Jean Belot, in which he disserted on fortune-telling and physiognomy, among other disciplines, would become widespread. Although the pretensions of these treatises were scientific, or at least sought to lend a certain credibility to these practices, there were also those who considered them to be superstition. This is the case of Johannes Praetorius and his Ludicrum chiromanticum Praetorii, whose first pages reproduce an illustration in which some women (probably gypsies, as one of them is carrying her child in her cloak, as was customary, and because they are all barefoot) say good fortune to a man while a child takes advantage of the situation to rob him. Torreblanca must have had a similar opinion of gypsies, since in his treatise De Magia published in 1678 he said that palm reading was a practice of which &#8220;the women of that mob of lost and unfaithful people whom the Italians call Cingari, the Latins call Egyptians and we call gypsies&#8221; took advantage.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/ludicrum-chiromanticum-praetorii/">Ludicrum chiromanticum Praetorii</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
