<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mandas testamentarias - History Lab</title>
	<atom:link href="https://historylab.es/tag/mandas-testamentarias-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://historylab.es</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 14:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Testamentary practices of Salamancan servants (1601-1650)</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/testamentary-practices-of-salamancan-servants-1601-1650/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=testamentary-practices-of-salamancan-servants-1601-1650</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criados]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funerales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Género]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandas testamentarias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentalidades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muerte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mujeres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religiosidad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salamanca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testamentos]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/practicas-testamentarias-de-criados-salmantinos-1601-1650/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Resource showing the mentality of the Salamanca servants on their deathbed according to the sex of the testators</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/testamentary-practices-of-salamancan-servants-1601-1650/">Testamentary practices of Salamancan servants (1601-1650)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attitudes to death are a reflection of the mentality of the time. Between 1601 and 1650, the 106 wills compiled by the author for the socio-professional group of servants in Salamanca give us a clear picture: the majority of servants were women (75% as opposed to 25% men). Despite the predominance of women, only 2.5% were able to sign, while in the male group this rises to 23%. Women were more likely to make offerings (47.5%), to leave their master as executor (57.7%) and their soul as heir (57.5%). The deep religiosity that permeated Ancien Régime society was also evident among male servants. Indeed, up to 38.5% offered their inheritance to their soul to ensure their welfare beyond the earthly life through masses and offices for the souls. It was also common for them to ask to be accompanied at their funeral by a clergyman or by a religious institution, such as the confraternities.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/testamentary-practices-of-salamancan-servants-1601-1650/">Testamentary practices of Salamancan servants (1601-1650)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burial place of the Salamancan servants (1601-1650)</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/burial-place-of-the-salamancan-servants-1601-1650/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=burial-place-of-the-salamancan-servants-1601-1650</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criados]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funerales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Género]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospitales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandas testamentarias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentalidades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muerte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mujeres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religiosidad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salamanca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sepulturas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testamentos]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/lugar-de-sepultura-de-los-criados-salmantinos-1601-1650/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Table showing the preferred burial place of Salamancan servants, according to sex, between 1601 and 1650</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/burial-place-of-the-salamancan-servants-1601-1650/">Burial place of the Salamancan servants (1601-1650)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The servants of Salamanca between 1601 and 1650 were predisposed to be buried in the church, followed by places not yet determined, convents or hospitals. This attitude to death is conditioned both by the mentality of the time and by the socio-economic characteristics of the group to which they belonged. Why in the Church? The motivations identified by the author reflect, firstly, the family conscience, as their ancestors were buried there, and secondly, the lower economic cost, as it was cheaper than the other options. Those buried in convents either had a relationship of dependence on them, being servants of these institutions, or had devotions to certain religious orders, which is why there was a higher percentage of men than women who chose this option: 26.9% compared to 22.5%. However, many of the testators (23.75% of women and 34.6% of men) did not specify the place of burial, leaving the choice to their executors, where relatives and masters were the most common choices.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/burial-place-of-the-salamancan-servants-1601-1650/">Burial place of the Salamancan servants (1601-1650)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beneficiaries of the wills of the Murcian prebendaries (1743-1820)</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/beneficiaries-of-the-wills-of-the-murcian-prebendaries-1743-1820/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=beneficiaries-of-the-wills-of-the-murcian-prebendaries-1743-1820</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alto clero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catedrales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclesiásticos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estrategias familiares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Familia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herencias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iglesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandas testamentarias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrimonios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproducción social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmisión de la propiedad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/beneficiarios-de-los-testamentos-de-los-prebendados-murcianos-1743-1820/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Table showing the importance of the family for the high clergy of the cathedral of Murcia at the time of testament: family awareness, mentality and strategies of patrimonial concentration</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/beneficiaries-of-the-wills-of-the-murcian-prebendaries-1743-1820/">Beneficiaries of the wills of the Murcian prebendaries (1743-1820)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The resource deals with the inheritance strategy of the prebendados of the cathedral of Murcia between 1743 and 1820. Despite what the ecclesiastical literature proposed (that the clergy&#8217;s assets should be destined to the Church and the poor), the high clergy of Murcia returned the benefits they obtained to their families. In fact, of the 46 wills studied, 52% (24 cases) had the clergyman&#8217;s family as the main beneficiary; 24% (11 cases) the Church; and another 24% the family-Church binomial. Overall, the burden of family obligations was the main motivation for making a will. The possible inheritance received and the patrimony to be ordained clergy subject to celibacy dispersed the family assets among the offspring; the return of the assets to the family meant, once again, the concentration of patrimony. However, the author warns, the tendency to put the family as the main beneficiary decreased by 9% compared to the period from 1591 to 1746.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/beneficiaries-of-the-wills-of-the-murcian-prebendaries-1743-1820/">Beneficiaries of the wills of the Murcian prebendaries (1743-1820)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typology of testamentary beneficiaries according to the groups of the Chapter of the Cathedral of Murcia (1743-1820)</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/typology-of-testamentary-beneficiaries-according-to-the-groups-of-the-chapter-of-the-cathedral-of-murcia-1743-1820/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=typology-of-testamentary-beneficiaries-according-to-the-groups-of-the-chapter-of-the-cathedral-of-murcia-1743-1820</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alto clero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabildo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canónigos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catedrales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dignidades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclesiásticos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estrategias familiares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Familia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herencias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iglesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandas testamentarias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movilidad social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrimonios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racioneros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproducción social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmisión de la propiedad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/tipologia-de-beneficiaros-testamentales-segun-los-grupos-del-cabildo-de-la-catedral-de-murcia-1743-1820/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Table showing family concerns according to the group to which they belonged within the chapter of the cathedral of Murcia. Social ascent as a source of family awareness</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/typology-of-testamentary-beneficiaries-according-to-the-groups-of-the-chapter-of-the-cathedral-of-murcia-1743-1820/">Typology of testamentary beneficiaries according to the groups of the Chapter of the Cathedral of Murcia (1743-1820)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the clergy did not have the same concerns or strategies of social reproduction. The resource shows us the differences in the wills of the cathedral chapter of Murcia between 1743 and 1820. Although there were common tendencies, such as favouring the family lineage through patrimony against the moralistic treatises of the Church, the strength with which these policies of inheritance transmission were perpetuated differed according to the ecclesiastical grade. The most family-conscious group in the chapter was the Dignities. The author identifies the trajectories of each of the members and reveals that, in contrast to the traditional idea of belonging to the nobiliary estate, and thus being imbued with the idea of lineage, the members were made up of families who had recently joined the local oligarchies in a process of social ascent. Their arrival in the upper strata gave rise to the need to consolidate their position there, so that nurturing the family through patrimony was one of their concerns. The rest of the groups, both canons and racioneros, also underwent this process. Many of these family estates led to the entry of another generation into the clerical estate, a fundamental issue within the strategies of social reproduction and perpetuation of the lineage.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/typology-of-testamentary-beneficiaries-according-to-the-groups-of-the-chapter-of-the-cathedral-of-murcia-1743-1820/">Typology of testamentary beneficiaries according to the groups of the Chapter of the Cathedral of Murcia (1743-1820)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amount and distribution of the mandas to the Church of the prebendados of the cathedral of Murcia (1743-1820)</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/amount-and-distribution-of-the-mandas-to-the-church-of-the-prebendados-of-the-cathedral-of-murcia-1743-1820/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=amount-and-distribution-of-the-mandas-to-the-church-of-the-prebendados-of-the-cathedral-of-murcia-1743-1820</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alto clero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabildo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catedrales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cofradías]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclesiásticos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fábricas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herencias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iglesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandas testamentarias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parroquias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrimonios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pobres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XIX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmisión de la propiedad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/cuantia-y-distribucion-de-las-mandas-a-la-iglesia-de-los-prebendados-de-la-catedral-de-murcia-1743-1820/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Resource that deals with the amount of reals that the chapter of the cathedral of Murcia allocated between 1743 and 1820 to the poor and religious institutions</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/amount-and-distribution-of-the-mandas-to-the-church-of-the-prebendados-of-the-cathedral-of-murcia-1743-1820/">Amount and distribution of the mandas to the Church of the prebendados of the cathedral of Murcia (1743-1820)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concerns of the transmission of the patrimony for the members of the cathedral chapter of Murcia were their own families. Between 1743 and 1820, 52% of the main beneficiaries of the testamentary mandates of the chapter testify to this. However, the moralist treatises and the doctrine of the Church tried to ensure that the distribution favoured the ecclesiastical institution itself and the poor. How was the distribution and amount of the mandates for these items? As a minority with respect to the total inheritance, the main beneficiary was the cathedral factory with 37,700 reales. The hospital of San Juan de Dios also benefited with 13,220 reales and the Casa de la Misericordia with 9,870 reales. All these institutions had in common the assistance to the poor. Below 9,000 reales, we find ecclesiastical entities: convents, parishes or confraternities, the latter with the lowest contribution: 528.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/amount-and-distribution-of-the-mandas-to-the-church-of-the-prebendados-of-the-cathedral-of-murcia-1743-1820/">Amount and distribution of the mandas to the Church of the prebendados of the cathedral of Murcia (1743-1820)</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appointment of guardians and curators in wills. Valladolid, 18th century</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/designacion-de-tutores-y-curadores-en-testamentos-valladolid-siglo-xviii/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=designacion-de-tutores-y-curadores-en-testamentos-valladolid-siglo-xviii</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curadurías]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estrategias familiares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Familia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelidad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herencias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandas testamentarias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mundo Rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mundo urbano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrimonios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproducción social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tutores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valladolid]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/designacion-de-tutores-y-curadores-en-testamentos-valladolid-siglo-xviii/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Resource showing the mentality of testators when choosing the guardians of assets inherited by minor children</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/designacion-de-tutores-y-curadores-en-testamentos-valladolid-siglo-xviii/">Appointment of guardians and curators in wills. Valladolid, 18th century</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the Modern Age, testamentary mandates emerged as strategies of social reproduction aimed at improving the family lineage. Sometimes, the deceased testator bequeathed to his children, minors, the movable and immovable property that he had in his power and administration. However, these assets were placed under the guardianship of an adult, usually close to the family, to administer them until the offspring reached maturity. The choice of the administrators of the inheritance was not a minor matter, but was a major concern of the testator in view of the possible perversion of the person chosen. In Valladolid, 77.8% of those appointed guardians were the spouses of the deceased, followed at a great distance by other relatives (9.3%), siblings (2.9%), children and parents (both with 2.3%), and &#8220;others&#8221; (5.4%), a concept which brings together numerous categories of individuals related to the family through neighbourhood or spiritual kinship. The city of Valladolid marked the general trend more sharply; in contrast, the nuances of the rural world attenuated the divergent criteria. Differentiated by sex, women chose other relatives (35.8%) rather than their husbands (21.1%) to be the administrators of their children&#8217;s inheritance.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/designacion-de-tutores-y-curadores-en-testamentos-valladolid-siglo-xviii/">Appointment of guardians and curators in wills. Valladolid, 18th century</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inheritance distribution in the province of León in the 18th century</title>
		<link>https://historylab.es/inheritance-distribution-in-the-province-of-leon-in-the-18th-century/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=inheritance-distribution-in-the-province-of-leon-in-the-18th-century</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ad_hlab_min]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estrategias familiares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Familia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heredero único]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herencias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mandas testamentarias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matrimonios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montaña]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mundo Rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mundo urbano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrimonios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Políticas familiares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provincia de León]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproducción social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siglo XVIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sistema de herencia igualitario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transmisión de la propiedad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://historylab.es/2022/02/19/reparto-de-la-herencia-en-la-provincia-de-leon-en-el-siglo-xviii/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Table analysing the distribution of inheritance according to the socio-economic and geographical structure of the province of León in the 18th century. The unequal inheritance in mountain areas stands out</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/inheritance-distribution-in-the-province-of-leon-in-the-18th-century/">Inheritance distribution in the province of León in the 18th century</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distribution of inheritance was one of the main concerns of the testators. During the 18th century in the province of León there was a direct relationship between the socio-economic structural framework and the choice of the inheritance model. The egalitarian distribution in the agrarian areas of Cea-Campos, the Vega del Esla and the Páramo stands out. However, despite having a similar agrarian model, the mountain area had some differences with respect to the rest of the province of León: there was a tendency towards the improvement of the third and fifth (between 36.5% and 42.8%) and the testamentary mandates (30.5%-38.5%) which favoured a first-born son in contrast to the rest of the offspring. The limited arable land in these territories marked the family strategy aimed at guaranteeing the biological reproduction of at least one member of the family, without social descent. Indeed, the possible disintegration of the patrimony would condition the marital choice to lower strata; a downward social mobility that the families wanted to avoid.</p><p>The post <a href="https://historylab.es/inheritance-distribution-in-the-province-of-leon-in-the-18th-century/">Inheritance distribution in the province of León in the 18th century</a> first appeared on <a href="https://historylab.es">History Lab</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
